JUDICIAL  Jackasses

05 / 16 / 10

DO NOT READ!

Private Lettre to Lynette Quitone, Judge Sellers’ personal Court Reporter

DO NOT READ

You took my money and promised delivery.  $510 for a transcript.  This lowly litigant has no option.  Not allowed to type it himself as the Court Clerk will not accept it if it is not typed by you. 

You do not respond to any of my phone calls and have not carried out your promise that you will return my call. 

I have until June 1 to file in the Supreme Court and am delayed far too long to file an addendum in the Northern District.

Today Judge Sellers committed the crime of cruel and unusual punishment.  He did it when no crime warranting punishment; no crime of anything, for that matter, had been committed.  I have approval to include it in my present list of his violations of my Civil Rights.

In the last pre-trial conference before the trial Judge Sellers committed an act of violating my Constitutional Rights.  It is in the Due Process clause in the 14^th Amendment.  He did the same thing in the hearing of the 14^th of May. 

My question is straight forward.  Is Judge Sellers persuading you to stall and stonewall beyond my time limit to file my Appeal in the Supreme Court?  If you are, though you may not get caught, you are committing the criminal act of impeding Justice. 

You have got to be aware that he is a Defendant in my lawsuit under what is commonly called a 1983 federal statute.  Monday Judge Sellers will receive my Motion filed to compel him to respond to a requirement of the federal case in The Northern District Court,

Patrick Pickerill is also a Defendant.  I learned just today, from a call to the Capital, that “He does not have a leg to stand on.”  And he knows it.  Larry Stuart, too. Like rats on a sinking ship, Donna Pace and Tari Hughes are going to join them.  Why do you think they were not there today?  I will explain:

The last ‘conference’ Pickerill was not present.  That shows little concern for his clients.

Judge Sellers called him on the phone to make a record that he was present via phone.

That was not kosher; the fact is, Patrick Pickerill was not there and it gave NO JUSTIFICATION for postponing the hearing.  Factually, I did not want one.  But it ALSO gave me the opportunity to ask that he not be continued as MY babies non-concerned lawyer.  Patrick Pickerill should not have been allowed to continue; I had the right to ask that we proceed without him.

He did not show at this last one.  Clearly showing his 'Great Concern' for his toddler clients, my only Son and Daughter.  Judge Sellers KNEW he was not going to attend.  Judge Sellers did not call him on the phone.  I thought of asking Judge Sellers to call him on the phone.  Had I, and he didn’t, it would have proved my thought that Judge Sellers did not want Pickerill present.  I did, because I had some nice papers to serve him.  I can’t make him pick up his registered mail.  Nor can I make him respond in the Northern District. 

The hearing should not have been held and I should have insisted the postponement because the State can now postpone or even cause to not bloom in the Supreme Court if you get ‘cold feet’ and deliver the needed transcript in a timely manner, which, so far, you only have to postpone your obligation for but one short week and I will be out of time for filing it and hope another conspiracy transpires that keeps me from proceeding with my appeal. 

Well, even that may backfire.  I really don’t need an extra charge to attach to Pickerill.

But it certainly won’t hurt when, as it has not been settled that the termination is final, and won’t now until November, I have NOT lost the right to know how my daughter’s scar is healing.  The door has not been closed between my daughter and her father.

What Judge Sellers did, with his one two letter word, in attempting to close that door, is cruel and unusual punishment. 

How can that be?   Simple, and not difficult to prove.   First, when Judge Sellers told me at the pre-trial hearing that I “may get a lot of money from the Northern District [obviously meaning the defendants, of which he is one], but you are not getting your kids back,” shows that he was prejudiced.   Second, albeit He has not committed murder but what is the affect of a Father whose children have been stolen from him not to ever be allowed to see them again?  What should be the penalty?  What are one’s children’s monitary value?  Oh, by the way, are you aware that Mikah McCray had no court order to take My only son?  Have you seen the before/after X-rays?  That is, the OSUMC X-rays and the St. Francis X-rays?  His arm was broken almost a week after he was taken into custody for DHS without a court order!  I was told I could present this evidence to the jury.

In 1932 Bruno Hauptmann  took Charles A. Lindbergh, Jr. into custody without a Court Order.  Because Mr. Hauptmann acted in the same manner as Mikah McCray, they called it a kidnapping.  Judge Sellers supports Mikah McCray’s act.  Mikah McCray, however did not keep Charles Senior from knowing his son was being treated kindly.  Charles Senior was allowed to know the condition of his little son. 

Had Hauptmann told Charles Senior: “No!”  You are not allowed to know anything about your child,” it equates to a “Cruel and Unusual Punishment” you can not imagine.  Before Bruno killed the little baby, he was not as cruel toward Lindbergh as Judge Sellers has been to me.

Has my only Son had another all too many accidents?  I was required to do an ISP when the two X-rays prove I did not harm my son.  My only Daughter will carry that scar for the rest of her life!  You heard what I said that backs up my knowledge that such is true.  I also had a burn, about 30 years ago,  similar in nature to that of Hudson Hendrick, son of DHS’ Howard Hendrick who is also a defendant in the Northern District.  The scar has barely diminished.  I will carry it the rest of my life.  My only Daughter will carry her scar [not just the physical one, but the psychological one as well] the rest of her life. 

Consider the scenario of you being scared in your youth that will stick out like a sore thumb if you wear a low-cut gown or put on a 2-piece bathing suit.  Would you not be too conscientious to consider wearing what you want but can’t?  No ISP for the Mays but lets make sure her Natural Father doesn’t learn of any more accidents! 

Excessively Cruel And Unusual Punishment when this Natural Father has never done ANYTHING to harm a hair on either of his children’s heads.  Much less any other part of their anatomy.  Physically or psychologically.        

I don’t care whether you like me or not.  I hired you to do a job on your terms.  Do your job.  Scheming to cheat me out of my do is to say, “John, I heard Patrick call you an evil wicked man.  I heard Tari Hughes tell the jury she did not think he was even allowed to own a gun since his First Degree Murder Conviction.  Why am I walking the streets if there was any child abuse murder conviction?

You are in a precarious position.  You have the task of deciding to do the present Judge Sellers a favor and be his slave for the short while he has left and risk the loss of  your honorable status in shame or retain your honorable status by doing the right thing.

I will remove this personal letter to you when you give me a date positive I can pick up the transcript I paid for weeks ago and that should have been finished long before now.  We don’t need for anyone to read this but you, but it is too long to leave on your answering machine that has worked so well dozens of times, and I did not want it to get ‘lost in the mail’ like the six documents Patrick Pickerill never received after he signed for them [4] and the USPS verified “Confirmed Delivery” [2] via ‘tracked’ mail.   At the pre-trial hearing Larry Stuart told Judge Sellers he had no knowledge of any suit in the Northern District.  The next day I filed with the Pawnee Clerk the USPS Confirmed Delivery proving he received notice of same that very morning he told Judge Sellers he had no knowledge of anything in Federal Court.  I would not accuse Larry Stuart of lying to the judge, Our USPS probably just made a mistake. 

I could have sent this to you via USPS Certified Return Receipt but then it could sit unsigned for as long 15 days; or just 'get lost' like 6 mailed to Patrick Pickerill.

Again, I will delete this private letter to you

before I even look at the transcript. 

So let’s get on the ball!