JUDICIAL  Jackasses

NOVEMBER   6   2010

Two days after posting the preceding, John DuBiel was given notice that he was going to get a “Class X Write-up.”  But no details.  Another couple of days passed and he was given formal notice that it was “Disrespect To Staff” again, no details.  November 1 John was given a written copy of the details but has been unable to transmit copies to anyone but his Oklahoma City Attorney.  The Tribunal is scheduled for Wednesday, November 10, 2010.

I have volunteered as an “Expert Witness” for Mr. DuBiel.  Common in court proceedings both Civil and Criminal.  Usually presented by the Prosecution; especially when there are no credible ‘eye’ witnesses. 

In this case there are no credible ‘eye’ witnesses for the Prosecution; it is like a conflict between the North [Bluecoats] charging the South [Gray coat rebels] with an impropriety and the Judge, Prosecutor, only witnesses allowed AND the Jury are all Bluecoats. 

That sounds fair.  Especially to the Bluecoats holding the trial. 

One other little tidbit that needs little explanation for anyone who has ever seen the Jim Henson movie Labyrinth.    There is a scene in which the seeker comes upon a choice of one of two doors in which to enter.  There are two ‘attendants’ at the doors; one of whom always tells the truth, the other always lies.  In the real world, the Prosecutor and Judge are the only two in the courtroom who are not sworn to tell the truth.  Lying is permitted and the dishonest Prosecutors are certainly talented at that!  There is no penalty for lying and they always have the last word. 

The witnesses, especially me, and Mr. DuBiel are sworn to tell the truth and only the truth or face the consequences of a perjury charge. 

The Bluecoats are all Honourable; must be, they won the war.  It is also common knowledge that the Graycoats were nothing but a bunch of rabble-rousing rebels. 

To date this writer and friend of Mr. DuBiel has been unable to get the details of the charge against him.  Only that he is alleged to have uttered a vulgar word of profanity used all too often in movies to get an “R” rating, three times in one short sentence. 

1 of 3

A word Richard Nixon used frequently; one time that comes to mind is on the White House Tapes when he refers to nuking a certain copulating country.  Three times.  Lyndon Johnson used it.  George C. Scott used it when played Patton . . . but I don’t believe Patton ever used it as it was not in vogue that long ago. 

Profanity, especially to such extreme, is a prime example of ignorance when appropriate words can not be found to accurately express an emotion. 

I have heard Bluecoats use the word all too frequently when referring to and conversing orders to inmates.  That is not the majority rule, however, only among the lower intellectual few, of which are frequently recycled inmates.  It is not common knowledge that upon discharge of a sentence an Ex-Con can get a job as a Bluecoat! 

Right or wrong; Officers in the Military get respect from the Enlisted.  Deserved or not.  Officers in DOC demand respect from the inmates.  No always necessarily deserved respect as there are rotten apples in every barrel.  Our past Governor David Hall is an example.  But his shortcoming was not exhibited with an ignorant vocabulary.  

Nor any suppressed jealousy trait that seeks vengeance without cause simply because he has the power to throw a monkey wrench into a parole in process.  Such happens.  Even to the extent of a ‘reward’ to an inmate witness who testifies to what is wanted in the testimony, true or not.

Such does happen.  Without the deceitful elements, Disney’s Prince of Persia could not have been created.  That is fiction; this is about reality.

John DuBiel is highly intelligent.  He is articulate and has always been disgusted at the extremely low level of vocabulary used by most inmates.  Frequently I have heard his reproach an inmate with words to the effect “If you can’t get your mind out of your crotch and quit copulating with every sentence I don’t want to talk to you.”  And, more than once, I have heard the response,  “What does ‘copulating’ mean?”

The word John ALLEGEDLY used was not even in the Colliers three-volume dictionary I grew up with.  It is, however, in my most recent Oxford American Dictionary as a vulgar [meaning common; i.e.; Syringia Vulgaris: Common Lilac] slang to “have intercourse with (someone).

Following that first definition are sixteen variants including the one John ALLEGEDLY used that means “A vulgar (common) slang used for emphasis to express anger, annoyance, or surprise.” 

2 of 3

I had never looked for this word in my dictionary before today.  At age 73, I had retained only knowledge of the fact that it did not exist in my three-volume Colliers!

Still, knowing John, I do not believe he used the vulgar [common] slang.

ASSUMING, however, and a break-down of that word  is making an ASS [our of] U [and] ME, so I don’t like to assume anything, but assuming if he did,  expressing a surprise is definitely not in any way, shape, or manner, disrespectful! 

I used the word summer, 2009, when Nancy asked me what I was doing to my flowers:  “I’m f…ing my Amaryllis.” 

                                                                 “WHAT?!!”

                                                                                        “I’m cross-breeding a male South African Hadeco Benfica with a female Netherlands Madonna.” 

I thought it funny. Crossbreeding Amaryllis is a hobby of mine.   I am the proud ‘papa’ of a couple dozen Nerene sized babies from that episode. 

To reiterate, ASSUMING, and a break-down of the word assume is making an ASS [our of] U [and] ME, so I don’t like to assume anything, but assuming even if he did use the word,  expressing a surprise is definitely not in any way, shape, or manner, disrespectful! 

The more probable cause of action in this matter was precipitated by one who is either jealous that Mr. DuBiel was granted parole and wishes to usurp his status or one who’s nature is simply to cause trouble so he can sit back and laugh at another’s artificially and maliciously  created misfortune. 

The ramifications of the perpetuation of this hokum accusation, simply put, are designed to throw a monkey wrench into the process of Mr. DuBiel’s Parole; punishing for no purpose, depriving John of his window of opportunity to become an asset to whatever community he would choose to reside; especially to the two disabled Senior Citizens in this household who have opened their arms to him, and reduce a brilliant mind to waste at a cost/burden of another $60,000+ medical a year to the DOC that already can not make ends meet due to overcrowding with those that need to remain incarcerated.  John Dubiel has harmed no one and is a harm to no one.  Simple logic dictates: Let him go.

John Schoonover

Posted on judicialjackasses.com November 7, 2010

under the protection of our First Amendment.

3 of 3

NEXT

ALICE IN WONDERLAND

by Corporal Leighlow, LCCC Lawton Oklahoma